
Finviz vs TradingView — Which Is Better for Traders & Investors in 2025?
TradingView and Finviz are two of the most popular platforms among traders and investors worldwide. Both offer unique strengths, and many professionals actually use them together. In this guide, we compare them feature-by-feature so you can decide which is best for your trading style.
Quick Summary
- TradingView: Best for advanced charting, backtesting, alerts, and global market coverage.
- Finviz: Best for lightning-fast screening, heatmaps, and market snapshots.
- Many traders use both: Finviz for idea generation, TradingView for deep analysis.
Feature Comparison
Charts & Technical Analysis
TradingView offers industry-leading interactive charts, Pine Script automation, and dozens of tools. Finviz provides quick charts for snapshots but not as customizable.
Screening & Idea Generation
Finviz wins here with its powerful screener combining fundamentals and technicals. TradingView’s screener is useful, but Finviz is faster for bulk scans.
Backtesting & Strategy Development
TradingView includes backtesting via Pine Script and Strategy Tester. Finviz does not offer native backtesting.
Alerts & Automation
TradingView offers flexible cloud-based alerts, including webhook automation. Finviz Elite offers basic alerts via email.
Data Coverage
TradingView covers global markets (stocks, crypto, forex, indices). Finviz focuses mainly on US stocks.
Pricing Snapshot
- TradingView: Free tier + paid plans from ~$13.99/month (annual billing).
- Finviz Elite: $39.50/month or $299.50/year (discounted annual).
Who Should Use Which?
- Choose TradingView if you need advanced charting, backtesting, and global coverage.
- Choose Finviz if you want ultra-fast US stock screening and heatmaps.
- Best approach: Use both together — Finviz to find trades, TradingView to validate them.
Try
Try TradingView — Free Trial Try Finviz Elite — 7-Day Trial
FAQs
Get in Touch
If you have questions about choosing between TradingView and Finviz, fill out the form below and we’ll get back to you:
